Congress
The general elections are fast approaching, and the big question on everybody’s minds is, “Will the Republicans lose control of Congress?” To answer that question, I like to turn to the financial markets.
The Dow has been hitting record highs lately, and oil has backed off significantly from its summer peak. Both of these metrics have a profound psychological impact on the populace, but their connection to the election is capricious at best. I prefer to look towards an exotic futures market for my political insight.
As I’ve mentioned in the past, the University of Iowa runs a futures market for the outcome of major US elections. A really simple, hand-wavy explanation is that the market allows investors to put their money where their mouth is; this is a real market where people win and lose real money. Contracts are available for control of the Senate, control of the House, and overall status of the Congress.
This sort of market tends to be good at predicting the future because its participants tend to make transactions that they think will be most profitable regardless of their heart-felt biases. To wit: if a Democrat really wanted to see the Dems win the House but saw all signs as pointing towards continued Republican control, he would buy a contract that would make him a profit if the Republicans kept power.
What are the markets currently predicting? It depends on which market is being evaluated, but in general, the consensus is that the Republicans will lose the House. The Senate race is less clear, but at the moment, the signs suggest that the Democrats will not control the Senate. It will be interesting to see how accurate the markets are. Historically, they’ve been pretty good at a few weeks out, but the markets incorrectly called the Senate outcome for the last mid-term election.
Speaking of futures markets, check out the new housing futures. That market is currently predicting a 7% drop in home values nation-wide by August 2007. Might want to hold off on that home purchase just a bit longer…
Recent Comments