Today was a productive day. I did laundry, applied for several jobs, altered my class schedule, plotted to take over the world… In other words, the usual.

Back in December I donated blood. Early this afternoon, I remembered that I could get a free cholesterol count based on my blood donation. I waded through some voice mail menus (‘Press 9 if you want to hear a duck quack’), talked to a real person (!) and eventually found the correct number for my reading. The result? I have a cholesterol level of 135 mg/dL, which I guess is pretty good.

To what do I attribute this reading? Beats me. I live a fairly sedentary life, and my paternal family tree has a history of heart issues (one of the reasons I want to work for Guidant or Medtronic). It must be the several bowls of Cheerios that I’ve eaten almost every day for as long as I can remember. Avoiding everything in the ARA except the sandwiches probably hasn’t hurt. In addition, I haven’t eaten at a fast-food joint in about six months, and have all but given up pop [soda for you Wisconsonites].

Appropriately enough, my Fraternity lineage is going to Outback tonight. Mmmm…. delicious cholesterol-laden steak.

Once again I am reminded of the conservatism that enshrouds Indiana. Today in the Commons at Rose, I was reading the Indianapolis Star when I came across this article. In a nutshell, the Indiana legislature wants to require the words “In God We Trust” in every room in every public school in Indiana. Danville schools already have such a requirement. My favorite quote from the article: “Our country was founded on the belief of trust in God. We need to bring that aspect of patriotism back into the schools and in the classroom.” Hmmm… I’m not sure I agree with that one. Our country was founded with secular ideals. It wasn’t untill 1955 that “In God we Trust” became the national motto; prior to that year, E Pluribus Unum held the honor.

It is my belief that the Indiana law is an effort by the religious right to get prayer into schools. I am especially intrigued by the use of patriotism as a justification. Why? The use of ‘In God We Trust’ as a patiotic phrase was upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals in the 1978 case O’HAIR vs. BLUMENTHAL. Wrote the court about the motto: “Its use is of a patriotic or ceremonial character and bears no true resemblance to a governmental sponsorship of a religious exercise.” Church and State should be separated. Period. No ‘Believing in God is patriotic, so we should indoctrinate our children to do so’ rhetoric. Absolutely separate.

Now before you dismiss me as a heretic atheist, let me describe my religious position: I believe in God. [Update, June 2003: this has changed. I would now describe my position as agnostic] I have no problem with religion. I have issues with the Catholic Church, but those are political in nature. However, I have a big problem with organizations forcing their beliefs on others, especially children. I have an even bigger problem with people who use religion as a means for power. Most of all, I cannnot tolerate when religious zealots start wars in the name of God.

I was reading Tomislav’s blog earlier today when I was reminded of the letter I got from Lexmark:

“Dear Mr. Keacher:

Thank you for your interest in summer employment with Lexmark.”

Seems to start off like a rejection form letter. However, the next paragraph throws a curve:

“We anticipate a limited summer hiring program, so competition among candidates will be intense … In order to reviw your qualifications in detail, please complete the enclosed application for employment and return it in the envelope provided.”

Upon reading this, I became hopeful: Why would they send a more detailed application for employment with a rejection letter? I’ll fill it out and see what happens.

New revelation:

I just noticed that the letter uses the future tense, “will,” when referring to the job competition. Therefore, the jobs have not been selected yet. I still have a shot at it!

It’s amazing how popular The Simpsons still is popular, despite in my opinion “jumping the shark.” Tonight before Chapter, I was walking to the kitchen to refill my water pitcher. A Simpsons episode was being rerun by the local Fox affiliate at the same time. As I progressed on my journey, there was not a location, save the stairs, where I could not both see and hear the Simpsons: Every television on at the time was proclaiming the magic of “D’oh.”

Registration for Spring Term starts tomorrow for Sophomores. It looks to be a busy quarter, what with ADES, Econ, Circuits, and EDM. I was going to take Tech Comm as well, but decided against it. Fortunately, I have computed a schedule grid that makes my Wednesdays start at 10:40 and the other days start at 9:00.

My little brother (fraternity, not biological) Will got voted into Pike earlier this evening. Hurah!

And now, the quote you’ve all been waiting for: “And that summer, the Linux bug bit hard.” Happy now, Minufo?

I’m pleased to announce that the New and Improved Keacher.com is open. I’ve completed the move of the domain from Ringworld onto my own server. Why should you care? For one, now I can do cool things like a custom Keacher.com e-mail address. Secondly, I can now control the DNS information for Keacher.com, as I am Root on both the primary and secondary nameservers.

Want a fun word to impress your friends with? Was torpor not good enough? Try opprobrium! Meaning “a cause of shame or disgrace,” I imagine many will go through life without it ever once falling on their ears.

That reminds me of the pronunciation of ‘Porsche.’ The correct pronunciation is ‘PORSH – ah,’ with two syllables, not the ‘porsh’ inflection that many utter. Yes, I know that Gone in 60 Seconds used the ‘porsh’ version, but a movie’s mistake does not a truth make. If one says ‘porsh’ among those in the know, it is akin to yelling, “Look at me! I’m trying to sound cool, but I’m really a neophyte!”

To summarize:

• opprobrium == you rock!
• porsh == d’oh

Cheers!